Spetts
New member
This topic isn't necessarily confined to Rush, but I thought it might be of interest to this forum.
The other day, a bizarre album got me thinking. I was browsing R.E.M.'s YouTube Music page, and was caught off guard by this supposed "latest release..."
R.E.M. - Live in Athens, 1980
(I tried to upload the album art but I'm a Dingus and couldn't figure it out =[)
EEK!! A bootleg?? Unfortunately, this isn't unusual on streaming services. Bootlegs are listed on an artist's official page quite often. In fact, Rush's own YouTube Music page has several bootleg albums listed, with no obvious implication that they aren't endorsed by the band or label.
However, that's not what stood out about this R.E.M. bootleg to me. Look closely at the album artwork... That certainly looks AI generated to me! On it's own, not a big deal. Labels that were probably going to steal some artwork anyway can have an easier time ripping off Michael Stipe's likeness for a bootleg, so what? Well, it got my imagination spinning.
One day, AI might become advanced enough to generate a convincing "long lost" recording of Rush, close enough to record to cassette and pass off as a hidden gem. How will AI-generated content affect archival in the context of rare bootlegs, which can sometimes be dubious in origin as is? Do you think bootleg labels, hoarders and whatnot will use this tech to rip off desperate fans? Does our community need to prepare to combat this, or do you think that AI will stay too rudimentary to be considered a threat?
On the other hand, are you perhaps looking forward to AI bootlegs? Even if it's completely fabricated, wouldn't it be kind of awesome to finally hear a "live" version of Fountain of Lamneth, or would that be completely and utterly immoral, no exceptions? I'd like to hear some thoughts on all of this.
The other day, a bizarre album got me thinking. I was browsing R.E.M.'s YouTube Music page, and was caught off guard by this supposed "latest release..."
R.E.M. - Live in Athens, 1980
(I tried to upload the album art but I'm a Dingus and couldn't figure it out =[)
EEK!! A bootleg?? Unfortunately, this isn't unusual on streaming services. Bootlegs are listed on an artist's official page quite often. In fact, Rush's own YouTube Music page has several bootleg albums listed, with no obvious implication that they aren't endorsed by the band or label.
However, that's not what stood out about this R.E.M. bootleg to me. Look closely at the album artwork... That certainly looks AI generated to me! On it's own, not a big deal. Labels that were probably going to steal some artwork anyway can have an easier time ripping off Michael Stipe's likeness for a bootleg, so what? Well, it got my imagination spinning.
One day, AI might become advanced enough to generate a convincing "long lost" recording of Rush, close enough to record to cassette and pass off as a hidden gem. How will AI-generated content affect archival in the context of rare bootlegs, which can sometimes be dubious in origin as is? Do you think bootleg labels, hoarders and whatnot will use this tech to rip off desperate fans? Does our community need to prepare to combat this, or do you think that AI will stay too rudimentary to be considered a threat?
On the other hand, are you perhaps looking forward to AI bootlegs? Even if it's completely fabricated, wouldn't it be kind of awesome to finally hear a "live" version of Fountain of Lamneth, or would that be completely and utterly immoral, no exceptions? I'd like to hear some thoughts on all of this.
Last edited: